Wednesday, May 28, 2008

20th anniversary: LBJ/Pierce commemorate, not re-enact the Dominique/Bird dual



Roughly 20 years ago Larry Bird and Dominique Wilkins engaged in what many people consider the best mono ah mono dual in the history of sports, not just in basketball. The stakes were fairly high. It was Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals and both teams were legitimate title contenders (but not the favorites).

Twenty years later in another high stakes Eastern Conference Semifinals Game 7, Lebron James and Paul Pierce put on a performance that reminded all of us of the Bird/Wilkins epic and had many analysts anointing it the remake of the classic Bird/Wilkins clash. It was a great game, but it was not the recreation the media is selling to you.

For LBJ and Pierce, the stakes were just as for Bird/Wilkins and arguably the duo are about as big of vaunted superstars in their respective era. Still, it was not the same.

Analysis

1. The Match-up

The Bird/Wilkins duo featured the two best small forwards of all-time. The three-time champion, Bird, squared off against the young Wilkins, the 'Human Highlight Reel’. Wilkins never went on to win a championship or make the 50 greatest of all-time. Danny Ainge, who was on the court for the game, downplayed that saying that he was one of the 30 greatest of all-times and that he’d be the one with the rings if he played with Kevin McHale and Robert Parish, who together with Bird make up the undisputed greatest front line of all-time.

Twenty years later, the match-up of Lebron James vs. Paul Pierce is nothing to scoff at. LBJ could be considered the best of all-time when it’s all said and done, though he’ll have a hard time surpassing Jordan, Bird, Magic, Russell, Duncan, Shaq and Kobe. Pierce on the other hand is a perennial All-Star. To parallel Danny Ainge’s line of thinking, had Pierce played with Shaq, maybe he’d be the one with three rings. But Pierce is about a quarter notch below Kobe’s level just as Dominique was about a quarter notch below Bird’s level, so there is room for error there.

LBJ and Dominique were the undisputed kingpins on otherwise mediocre teams. But while Bird was the crown jewel on a team of aging stars (and one diamond in the rough: the young Reggie Lewis), it is not really known who the leader of the Celtics is, KG or Pierce. To their credit, they don’t feel a need to be crowned, but rather equally yoked.

2. Bird’s Post Game 6 Rhetoric

Inexperience would cost the Hawks the chance to close out the series in Game 6 in Hotlanta (Cleveland had to win their game 6 to force a Game 7). Heading back to Boston, a confident Bird proclaimed,
"They had a big chance to beat us. I think now that we're going to come out and play like we did tonight but we're going to be at home and our shots are going to be dropping a little bit better and we're gonna be running a little faster. So I'd say Sunday's going to be a big win for the Celtics.”


Bird had won his three rings and was slightly past his prime, but yet he had put his legacy on the line. Or perhaps more accurately, he did not care what his legacy was. He had immense abilities and the heart of a champion. Bird lived for such gamesmanship. Unlike LBJ and Pierce who nervously awaited Game 7, Bird reveled in the pre Game 7 hoopla.

Bird called the win and when it was all said and done, there was nothing the Hawks could do about it. The Hawks all played with the extra fire of proving Bird wrong and still came up short. Perhaps a Game 7 in the Boston Garden would not have been so close, had Bird not talked his trash.

3. Two unstoppable stars

Bird was splitting double and triple teams, making shots on curls, rainbow fade-away shots out of the post, splitting triple teams, shooting left handed hooks from his ankles, hitting tear drops, slivering between players in the air for shots, nailing jumpers off of screens and making defensive stops on the other end.

Dominique, who was still a raw talent, was able to get in the zone and expand his range. When he jumped he was in the air forever and nobody was usually within a foot of blocking it, before he swished or banked it in. He was still able to throw in a few of his patented tomahawk dunks for good measures.

In the end, the more chiseled Bird, respecting Wilkins explosiveness. He made every shot out of fear that if Dominique had a chance to make the game winning shot, there would be nobody that could stop him. Bird would not miss when Atlanta needed a stop. In the end Bird outscored Wilkins 20-14 in the 4th quarter.

As the clique goes, Bird and Dominique were unstoppable, making shots at will. At the end of the 08 game, we saw LBJ throwing up an ugly shot that could not draw iron. When the Celtics needed a big shot to stem the tide, it was journeyman and little used reserve PJ Brown (4-4) hitting a jumper and putting a nail in the coffin.

4. The supporting casts

It’s important to note how much better the supporting casts were for the ‘88’ teams over the ‘08’ teams.

The Celtics had the best starting line-up in NBA history. In addition to the greatest frontline of all-time (Bird, Parish, McHale), they had a Hall of Fame quality back-court. Ainge was money from the outside. On a lesser team he would have made more all-star teams and had a string of 20 ppg seasons. Before going to the Celtics, Dennis Johnson, who some call the most under-rated PG of all-time was the leader of a Sonics team that won a championship. Though One time at school, I was trying to argue DJ’s greatness to a bunch of Lakers fans and I was stupefied by the response, “He’s the only black guy I’ve ever seen with freckles.” What do you say to that?

Contrary to Ainge’s account that they were all spectators come the 4th quarter. The Celtics starting line-up came to play. All fiver players were in double digits. McHale went 10-14 from the field and was 13-13 from the line, while adding 13 boards. The Chief, DJ and Ainge score 14, 16 and 13 respectively. DJ and Ainge added 18 assists to Bird’s 6 to keep up with Doc Rivers 18 assists. The starting line-up held the fort, allowing Bird to conserve his energy for the 4th quarter, in which he would score 20 of his 34 points.

Even the lesser Hawks had solid weapons. The Hawks had not one, but two dynamite point guards. Doc Rivers relegated the explosive Spud Webb to the bench as he went for 16 points and 18 assists. Randy Wittman was a deadly shooter. He went 11-13 from the field. Kevin Willis was a beast on d and on the boards. He also went for a modest 11 points and 11 rebounds double-double.

The superior quality of the ‘88‘ supporting casts over the ‘08‘ is the reason that the score was 118-116, 20 years prior to the ‘08’ 97-92 game. The teams combine to shoot for 58.8 percent in ‘88’. The ‘08’ teams combined to shoot a mere 46.2 percent. That’s a big discrepancy. The ‘08’ teams are marginally better on defense, but clearly the ‘88’ teams were offensively superior in their Game 7 and in general.

5. Lasting sights and sounds

I can still hear Tommy Heinsohn amazed voice proclaiming “It’s a dual.” Or the other more stoic old school play by play announcer saying “It’s Bird’s turn,” as Bird nailed a curl in a string of consecutive baskets.

Then there was the crowds of ‘88’. Besides the unique fashions, you could just see the amazement on the crowds’ faces. A poster proclaimed, ‘Our Bird can fly higher than any hawk.’ Then there was a waving sheet on a rafter stating that it was ‘Bird’s Nest.’
I’m sure Heinsohn gave a lot of Tommy points to LBJ and Pierce.

The crowd was reacting to the many amazing plays. In 2008, LBJ and James combined to shoot 50 percent on mostly a few impressive in your eye jumpers. The shots were good and the intensity of Game 7 was there. And even Pierce/James outscored Bird/Dominique 86-81. It’s things like that that make the game comparable on paper. But although Pierce and James put on an ‘instant classic’, Bird and Wilkins engaged in a timeless epic.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

No walk-off knock-offs here

Long before there was Red Sox nation and Yankees Country, there was Wally World. In a summer game in 1989, a still prime Wally Joyner hit a a 3 run walk-off home run verse the Tigers. Angels fans were clamoring for days, even without the benefit of the internet. (I was bummed though, since I missed the shot as I had to leave the game early after my mental brother was kicked out for jumping on the field in pursuit of a foul ball.)

On another night in the early nineties, some friends and I kept sneaking down from our on the field seats, but in the outfield. By the last inning we had made it first row, behind home plate. The Angels were down 0-4 but had come back to tie it 4-4 with fan favorite Dick Schofield at the plate and the bases load. The long-time Angel walked on four pitches as the other team walked off the field with their heads down.

Those were both walk-offs! Literally the Angels could score the winning run, strutting around the bases if they wanted too; hence the term: walk-off. The walk-off was a rare but inspiring feat. It was a revered feat and we all knew what a walk-off was.


Somehow as attention spans shortened, and Sports Center and other brands craved ways to keep the low attention peeps satisfied; the term walk-off got watered down. All of the sudden any home team that came up and hit a ball into the outfield as the winning run sprinted in to beat the throw, qualified as a walk-off.
That is not a walk-off people.

Perhaps the media feels justified by the fact that the team walks off the field. But that was not considered a walk-off back in the day; at least not in my circles. Nor was it always portrayed as a walk-off until about the last decade or so.


So yesterday, Garret Anderson came up with the bases loaded and one out and then walked on four pitches. The walk is the lesser of the two walk-offs, but it still counts. It's almost as embarrassing to the other team as the home run as the pitcher just looks like he was too scared to throw it in there and give up a game winning grand-slam.


Angels manager Mike Scioscia's said, "It was a walk-off win and we'll tak it." Indeed it was Sciosc (Soash). It was a first degree walk-off. A jack would have been a second degree walk-off. Everything else is just fool's gold.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Drew Carey: A sports revolutionary


Comedian Drew Carey is revolutionizing sports management as we know it. Carey, who is a huge soccer fan and now a minority owner of the MLS expansion team, Seattle Sounders, announced that every four years, season ticket holders can vote on whether to keep or fire the team's general manager.

Undoubtedly, all the elitists and professionals 'in the know,' will tout how terrible an idea this is. Some of their arguments will be correct and other arguments will be blather based on the Mel Brooks's philosophy of protecting their phony bologna jobs.

The dirty little secret of experts and executives is that they believe so many fans lean toward imbecilic on their knowledge concerning the intricate nuances of sports. Of course that's not a commentary on sports insiders. Human nature seems to relegate experts to a sense of elitism over the layman.

But if fans are avid and see the effects of management, then are they not qualified to make reasonable judgements on the quality of the the players, managers and executives. Fans do not have to be in the weight rooms, the clubhouses, the suites or even sitting courtside to understand the trends and many intricacies and how they affect their teams. Just as it bugs me to no end to see a professional sports player denigrate a reporter for not knowing what it's like to actually be playing (as if it's so complicated), so am I equally irritated to see sports executives pretend they are so much higher than the sports fans they allegedly cater to.

A 2004 book, 'The Wisdom of crowds' by James Surowiecki is built on the premise that crowds have received the unfair connotation of rowdiness and sub-par intelligence. He gives many antedotes to the contrary; such as the idea that the average of fair goers guesses for an ox's weight at a county fair was equal to the ox's exact weight.

It's true their are many unseen variables that go into managing a team that are not understood by fans and a GM could be unduly fired by fans. Consequently a GM's long term aspirations on his team's behalf could be sacrificed in order for that GM to increase his fan satisfaction that correlates with his job security. The DNA in building dynasties and perennial winners could be altered. Cost cutting sacrifices that could build a team's assets and long-term prowess would be less of an option and could even ironically result in higher ticket prices.

Still, as we enter the 'multimedia age', fans are becoming quite knowledgeable. Many fans have sports high IQ's and sensibilities that are higher than the leaders of their teams. Also the average sports fan can benefit and become more invested in his team's future by included in such a weighty decision.

We also must remember this is a season ticket holder vote and not just some online sports poll. Presumably, season ticket holders are very informed on their team's dealings. These are the fans at the heart and soul of any team's success.


Shotsheard cannot directly support or deny Drew Carey's groundbreaking policy of letting the fans control the fate of their team's GM. Their are pros and cons to both and nobody should say otherwise.

However, Carey has stumbled onto a new age business concept that is working in nearly every other industry, including even the 2008 presidential race. It's the concept that the consumers should have direct influence on the end-product. Video game makers have been doing it for years to gamers' intense satisfaction. With billions of dollars rolling in and the sports industry booming, big wigs should not be fooled into thinking that catering to the consumers is not an integral part of success.

In the meantime New England Revolution (soccer team) should abdicate their name to Seattle so that they can be called the Seattle Revolution, in honor of their part-owner, Drew Carey.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

2008 NBA Conference Finals Predictions


Who’s perfect? Say it with me. Who’s perfect? Shotsheard is 12-0 on playoff predictions and with the margin for error tightening, it’s going to be tough to stay that way. Still here are the picks that could see me get two more notches closer to the coveted 15-0.

Before the NBA even tipped off, I was texting a friend, asking who he wanted to win in the championship; The Silver and Black (Spurs) or The Dynasty (Celtics). The mid-season Gasol trade threw a wrench in my sureness and at that time with Bynum expected back by mid-March (his season is now over), I was (unofficially) changing my prediction for the West to the Lakers. So how do I feel now? Read on.

Lakers vs. Spurs

How important has the emergence of a big man at the center position been for the Lakers? Andrew Bynum’s pre-injury emergence and then Pau Gasol’s experience boosting the Lakers even more has taken the Lakers from a one and done playoff opponent to a team with a legitimate chance to win it all (even the favorite in most the experts eyes). And were the Lakers to have both big men healthy, they’d be the clear-cut favorite against the Spurs.

The Spurs still have enough in their defensive tank to contain Gasol and Kobe. That makes Odom the x-factor. A great series by Odom, likely means advancing and anything less leaves the door open for the Spurs. Ask Clippers and Heat fans how reliable Odom is for that to happen.

We’ve seen Bowen contain Kobe in the past just as he clamped down on Stojakovic to help the Spurs come back from 0-2 on the Hornets. Also Duncan had to constantly play middle man between a driving Chris Paul and alley-oop receiving Chandler. He can now anchor himself on defense more and that should translate to more concentration on the offensive end. Remember Duncan missed the last 10 shots of Game 7 against the Hornets and the Spurs still controlled the entire game.

And who do the Lakers have that can stop Parker and Ginobili? The media loves to hype up that Kobe can allegedly play great defense when he wants to. But have we really seen that out of him? It's a myth. He's not the glove. He's not Michael Jordan.

Despite those tough words, I see the worthiness of picking the Lakers who have a lot of offensive firepower even at times though they did look sloppy against the Jazz. But I have to go with the defending champions, who can take credit for beating the two toughest teams that are still not alive: The Suns and Hornets.

Pick: Spurs

Celtics vs. Pistons

We can talk about the Pistons going to six straight conference finals. But the Pistons have been sliding ever since they beat the Lakers in the 2004 Finals. Tayshaun Prince is the one hitting game winning shots, because guys like Billups and Hamilton are an eighth of a step slower.

The Pistons defense is not what it was. Flip Saunders does not ever get on them to have defensive tenacity and if he were to do that, they still are not the same defensive powerhouse that they were when a prime Ben Wallace anchored them.
Also, we must remember that the C's were a silly James Posey foul away from sweeping the Pistons in the regular season.

The Celtics, who hold home court advantage, have dominated at the allegedly new Boston Garden, having went 8-0 at home in the playoffs so far. Also in the last quarter of Game 6 in Cleveland, the Celtics showed signs of coming out of their road coma, though ShotsHeard has to admonish them for not winning a road game in Hotlanta or Cleveland, going 0-6. They have simply been a team without an identity on the road. The Big Three seemed to act like winning on the road was an entitlement, while role players followed their lead.

This is the match-up we’ve all been waiting for; but as usual, the Western Conference playoffs have stole the Eastern contestants thunder. Nonetheless who ever wins this series has enough in the tank to compete in a championship series. So once we get over our Western Conference playoffs withdrawals, this should be a fun series; assuming these teams can regularly crack 85 points. But don’t hold your breath. Brace yourself for the ugliness.

Pick: Celtics

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

The refs: The Lakers sixth man? - 2008 Western Conference Semifinals (NBA Officiating Corruption)

I hate conspiracy theories. For every true conspiracy theory there's countless manufactured wacky conspiracy theories.

But it's hard to be too trusting of the NBA's administration of Lakers playoff games in light of Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals. In that game, the worst officiated game in league history, the refs single handedly snatched the series out of the Kings hands and handed it to the higher television rated Lakers. In the aftermath, there were credible reports that the referees received incentives for their overall performance in the series.

So in the fourth quarter of Game 5 of the 2008 Western Conference Semifinals between the Lakers and Jazz when I saw Kobe get the benefit of an unlikely foul (not to be confused with the many ghost fouls he often gets), I thought here we go again. My feeling was confirmed by bad call after bad call.

Here are the MANY BAD CALLS I WITNESSED IN THE FOURTH QUARTER ALONE:

  • Lamar Odom took a back door pass and dunked it in. A ghost foul was called on the trailing Boozer.
  • Jordan Farmar drove to the basket for a layup over AK-47. A Jazz player reached at the passing Farmar, modestly getting all ball. The ref called it giving Jordan a free continuation shot that he would have otherwise not taken. It went in and he consequently got the and one.
  • With two seconds left on the shot clock, Walton was forced into a turnaround fade away shot. Harpring did not defend conservatively, but still got all ball on a shot that was not close and would have had a very high degree of difficulty. It was a classic bail-out by the refs.
  • Carlos Boozer got an offensive rebound and went back up with the shot with two Lakers draped on him. There was no call. On the transition the other way, Sasha Vujacic who has terrible ball handling skills, sloppily ran it up court and then kicked it out of bounds. The ref next to the play called no foul (as there wasn't one). A ref from the other side of the court called a foul on Kirilenko. Instead of the Jazz taking the ball, Vujacic made two bonus free throws.
  • On a play away from the ball, Derrick Fisher did his typical flop on a AK-47 hand check. Fisher went flying about seven feet and was rewarded with two more bonus shots.
  • With just under two minutes to go Pau Gasol got away with a push-off on Okur on a long offensive rebound. Gasol turned a 50-50 ball into a 100-0 ball. After getting the board, he then passed off to Odom for a dunk and a 103-100 lead.
  • Emboldened by the refs non-calls icing the game, Gasol got an even bigger push-off on Okur and went back up for a the back breaking dunk to make the game 107-102 with 20.7 seconds left.
I'd love to believe that the conspiracy theory is not true. I'd love to believe the Lakers just got the benefit of home court calls. I even feel a little silly strongly considering it without any tangible proof besides the terrible officiating. Still, I can't help but think that the check's in the mail.




NBA Officiating Corruption Articles:

The refs: The Lakers sixth man? - 2008 Western Conference Semifinals (NBA Officiating Corruption)


Crawford's boys and the Lakers beat the Spurs - 2008 NBA Western Conference Finals (NBA officiating corruption)

Six Part Series: Consider the reality, not the source - Part 1: It doesn't take a convicted felon... (Link connects to other six parts)

Monday, May 12, 2008

Scurrilous Trojans: Mike Garrett and Tim Floyd allowed OJ Mayo to cheat

Corruption In College Coaching Articles

Jim Calhoun's greedy remarks are indicative of a warped system

Kelvin Sampson: A cheater trying to prosper

Scurrilous Trojans: Mike Garrett and Tim Floyd allowed OJ Mayo to cheat


Borseth: Pathetic on many levels


Considering the Reggie Bush allegations and today's OJ Mayo taking gifts allegations ShotsHeard asks, when did it all go wrong for USC? Maybe there's a SC insider that could tell you. Ahh you see that play on words? Did I mean Sports Center or USC? Fresh. I serve the eggs and milk straight from the chickens and cows.

All joking aside since the situation at USC is sick; ShotsHeard believes the corruption starts with athletic director Mike Garrett and onto coach Tim Floyd. If you go to the USC campus, you will see Garrett's Heisman Trophy along with the Heisman trophies of Charles White, Marcus Allen Carson Palmer and Matt Leinert and at least for now Reggie Bush. As tainted as Bush's trophy is, a much more sickening sight will greet you.

O.J. Simpson's Heisman is proudly displayed with the others, signifying that sports accomplishments, even those of murderers (and O.J. is clearly a murderer even if a court of law failed to punish him) outshines basic humanity at USC. Never at any point did Mike Garret (who won his Heisman just three years before O.J.) take the initiative to not only stand against that as a fellow Heisman winner, but as the head representative of USC athletics, he allowed it to be displayed.

On the heels of Reggie Bush receiving thousands of dollars in perks while at USC there's a new controversy involving a big name (not a 'star'). OJ Mayo, a kid who reportedly came from an impoverished background received money, a television and thousands of dollars from a Rodney Guillory, who was an intermediate for Bill Duffy Associates (sports agency).

Espn's 'Outside The Lines' uncovered a mountain of evidence that shows that Guillory spent thousands on Mayo while being bank-rolled by BDA. Mayo is now signed with BDA.

How much of a blind of an eye did coach Tim Floyd and Mike Garrett tun? Guillory is a man who was reportedly in coach Tim Floyd's office when Mayo faxed his letter of intent to USC. This is the same Guillory who got former USC guard, Jeff Trepagnier in trouble for accepting agent kickbacks. Floyd and Garrett knew who Guillory was and what he was about and knew what was up when Mayo strolled around campus in thousands of dollars in new clothes.

Floyd clearly wanted success. Garrett on the other hand was too busy enjoying his status as a football god and the man who swung the biggest sac on campus to think that this could ever come back to him.

The truth comes to the light as it so often does. Now we will see if USC has a leader with the common sense to get rid of Garrett and Floyd. That's right; it is common sense. This is not a tough decision that needs to made in the spirit of vindication. It's simple ethics and common sense. If USC keeps Garrett and Floyd around continue to show the world that USC has no integrity and that they put money and glory first.


Corruption In College Coaching

Jim Calhoun's greedy remarks are indicative of a warped system

Kelvin Sampson: A cheater trying to prosper

Scurrilous Trojans: Mike Garrett and Tim Floyd allowed OJ Mayo to cheat


Borseth: Pathetic on many levels

Friday, May 9, 2008

Cedric Benson: Crying for his mommy


What is a baby bear, but a cub. Neither the Chicago Cubs fans or the Chicago Bears fans will be wanting Cedric representing the windy city after his cry-in with the law.

Cedric Benson recently shamed himself by allegedly driving his 30-foot boat drunk and resisting arrest. He then utterly humiliated himself and quite possibly destroyed what was left of his mediocre career by crying for his mommy after taking a facial of pepper spray.

Contrary to unsaid rumors, Cedric's mommy was reported to be one of the 15 passengers on the boat and not off buying Pampers for him and the rest of the goons on that boat. That's right; goons not Goonies; because everybody on that boat is pathetic by association.

Consequently, Benson is compounding the situation and showing his lack of character standing in complete denial of the charges, despite a police report, test and booking picture that paint a damning picture.

Is it possible Benson is innocent and fighting to protect his reputation? File that under 'A' for anything's possible. So with perception being reality (and probably in this case, reality being reality), Benson is compounding the situation by fighting misdemeanor charges instead of apologizing and recommitting himself to football.

Benson spent a little too long suckling at his mommy's teet for her to get around to teaching him the whole choose your battles concept.
The platoon running back has only been mildly serviceable in his first three years in the league. He's rushed for 1,593 yards, 10 TDs and a 3.8 yards per carry, while missing 13 games.

His goons undoubtedly are too busy talking crap on the 'pigs' and thinking of ways to con the system than to look at the reality that he is not some prize player and that he's more than expendable.

There, there Cedric. It's ok. When your career goes down the drain, you can spend more time with your mommy anyways.